13
Dec
10

“They were not protesters”

16th August 1819

The Peterloo Massacre (or Battle of Peterloo) occurred at St Peter’s Field, Manchester, England, on 16 August 1819, when cavalry charged into a crowd of 60,000–80,000 gathered at a meeting to demand the reform of parliamentary representation.

The end of the Napoleonic Wars in 1815 had resulted in periods of famine and chronic unemployment, exacerbated by the introduction of the first of the Corn Laws. By the beginning of 1819 the pressure generated by poor economic conditions, coupled with the lack of suffrage in northern England, had enhanced the appeal of political radicalism. In response, the Manchester Patriotic Union, a group agitating for parliamentary reform, organised a demonstration to be addressed by the well-known radical orator Henry Hunt.

Shortly after the meeting began, local magistrates called on the military authorities to arrest Hunt and several others on the hustings with him, and to disperse the crowd. Cavalry charged into the crowd with sabres drawn, and in the ensuing confusion, 15 people were killed and 400–700 were injured. The massacre was given the name Peterloo in ironic comparison to the Battle of Waterloo, which had taken place four years earlier.

Historian Robert Poole has called the Peterloo Massacre one of the defining moments of its age. In its own time, the London and national papers shared the horror felt in the Manchester region, but Peterloo’s immediate effect was to cause the government to crack down on reform, with the passing of what became known as the Six Acts. It also led directly to the foundation of The Manchester Guardian (now The Guardian), but had little other effect on the pace of reform. In a survey conducted by The Guardian in 2006, Peterloo came second to the Putney Debates as the event from British history that most deserved a proper monument or a memorial. Peterloo is commemorated by a plaque close to the site, a replacement for an earlier one that was criticised as being inadequate as it did not reflect the scale of the massacre.

10th April 1848

Chartism was a movement for political and social reform in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland during the mid-19th century, between 1838 and 1850. It takes its name from the People’s Charter of 1838, which stipulated the six main aims of the movement as:

1. A vote for every man twenty-one years of age, of sound mind, and not undergoing punishment for crime.
2. The secret ballot. – To protect the elector in the exercise of his vote.
3. No property qualification for members of Parliament – thus enabling the constituencies to return the man of their choice, be he rich or poor.
4. Payment of members, thus enabling an honest tradesman, working man, or other person, to serve a constituency, when taken from his business to attend to the interests of the Country.
5. Equal Constituencies, securing the same amount of representation for the same number of electors, instead of allowing small constituencies to swamp the votes of large ones.
6. Annual parliaments, thus presenting the most effectual check to bribery and intimidation, since though a constituency might be bought once in seven years (even with the ballot), no purse could buy a constituency (under a system of universal suffrage) in each ensuing twelve-month; and since members, when elected for a year only, would not be able to defy and betray their constituents as now.

On 10 April 1848, a new Chartist Convention organised a mass meeting on Kennington Common, which would form a procession to present another petition to Parliament. The estimate of the number of attendees varies depending on the source (O’Connor estimated 300,000; the government, 15,000; The Observer newspaper suggested 50,000). The most likely figure is 150,000. The government was well aware that the Chartists had no intention of staging an uprising. However, they were fears that a revolution would start spontaneously and the authorities were intent upon a large-scale display of force both to counter this threat and if possible stamp out Chartism in a year of revolutions across continental Europe. 100,000 special constables were recruited to bolster the police force. In any case, the meeting was peaceful. However the military had threatened to intervene if the Chartists made any attempt to cross the Thames.

9th December 2010

A policeman who was knocked unconscious by student rioters in Parliament Square told of the terrifying moment he came under a barrage of missiles from a hate-filled mob.

Pc Jim Mansfield, 29, suffered a blow to the head from a missile which cracked his protective helmet and left him with concussion. Doctors said he could have been killed had he still been wearing the soft cap he had on earlier.

Today Pc Mansfield, a borough-based officer who volunteers for riot duty, described Thursday’s riot as “the most concerted, sustained and large-scale violence I’ve ever faced”.

A veteran of public order protests, including last year’s G20 demos in the City, he had been part of a unit guarding the Palace of Westminster but was moved to the top of Victoria Street, where some of the fiercest clashes took place.

He said: “We were under a pretty concerted attack for more than an hour. They were throwing snooker balls, paint bombs, flares, fireworks and smoke grenades. They improvised with concrete blocks and metal fences, anything they could get their hands on.

“I had been hit on the head by a few objects by that point — we all had. But then something hit me on the top of my helmet — I didn’t see what it was — and I was knocked out cold. I just fell down in the crowd.”

He was trampled on and suffered severe bruising to his knees and legs before being dragged away from the front line. His riot shield was stolen.

The officer said that for much of the time the demonstration was good-natured. Earlier he had chatted with students and shared some mints he had brought.

But the mood turned quickly when a different group arrived with hoods and masks, armed with missiles and flares. He said: “They were not protesters, these people had come prepared.”

Pc Mansfield was one of 12 police injured in the riots.


20 Responses to ““They were not protesters””


  1. 1 Furor Teutonicus
    13 December, 2010 at 1:27 pm

    Peterloo took place onece. It made news..

    These bastards are doing this, apparantly weekly. And the Shiteholes from the “Guardian” tell us law breaking is not getting worse?????

    • 13 December, 2010 at 2:38 pm

      My reason for highlighting Peterloo (and with the update, Kennington Common) is that both those campaigns had very serious constitutional aims. Both took place in an era of total political corruption and terrible government. People did not have a general right of assembly and free speech.

      The current “protesters” don’t know how lucky they are to live in a free and prosperous country. Asking students to cough up a larger proportion of the cost of their courses is hardly the same as denying them the right to vote.

  2. 3 electro-kevin
    13 December, 2010 at 11:47 pm

    Some people are getting in a tizzy over the apparent use of soldiers dressed as policemen (Old Holborn’s site) An officer wearing battle fatigue DPM trousers beneath his overalls was photographed.

    In the time that I did riot policing I never heard of or saw military personnel deployed among police officers. I’m inclined to think it was probably a police spotter who’d been ordered to don overalls and take up a normal riot position.

    Have any of your mates heard of soldiers being deployed alongside coppers ? Dressed as coppers ?

    It’ll be a new one on me !

    (RMP have civil powers of arrest – I know that much is true)

    • 4 electro-kevin
      13 December, 2010 at 11:49 pm

      Clarification – The ‘spotter’ being dressed in plain clothes and grungy so as to be able to mingle with the great unwashed. DPM being a favourite attire.

    • 14 December, 2010 at 8:04 am

      EK I agree with Old Holborn in that using the army to quell a riot would be a major development and one which could bring down the house of cards of the liberal civil society. However I suspect that this is not happening. For a start, we don’t really have an army and what army we have is abroad!

      The naval equivalent of the RMP do too and apparently misbehaving ratings are swept up from port towns before the police can get their hands on them.

  3. 6 Furor Teutonicus
    14 December, 2010 at 8:16 am

    RMP only have “Civil popwers” in declared time of emergency. It USED to be that the back of your RMP warrant card was a “Special Constable” warrant card, giving full civil police powers. But that is now not so, so I have heard from my mates still “in” the U.K RMP/RAFP and Regulating branch.

    Authority of police powers only extends to Squaddies/Matlots/Airmen, on or off duty, their immediate dependents living on military areas, civilian staff working on/in military areas, and visitors to such.

    Of course we were WELL versed in “Civilian powers of arrest”….:-))

  4. 7 Furor Teutonicus
    14 December, 2010 at 8:18 am

    Squaddies etc also, obviously includes NCOs and Officers. But any one not RMP is just a grunt any way. :-) )))

  5. 15 December, 2010 at 1:21 am

    In response to the soldiers under Police uniform thing
    - rubbish.

    There will be DPM, amongst other things under the public order overalls.

    That’s because when we parade in public order coveralls we wear our own civvies underneath. I personally also wear an old pair of combats as they’re both comfy and inappropriate for civvy street – along with a £2 or less long sleeve top from Primarni…

  6. 15 December, 2010 at 1:24 am

    FT – RMP drinking in Chichester was always a giggle, not least because of the blue rinse brigade disapproving.

    Sad that they left Chi – I enjoyed drunken RMP stories.

  7. 13 Furor Teutonicus
    15 December, 2010 at 5:23 am

    “The hole in the wall” back of main street was my favourite.:-))

  8. 15 December, 2010 at 5:51 pm

    Hole in the Wall a good choice, not least because it still had the actual hole in the wall… also RMP were spotted in The Chichester pub itself, and whatever the name of the converted monastery opposite the Cathedral.

    FT, are you still in? Have you got an email address you’re happy to share?

  9. 16 December, 2010 at 12:03 pm

    If me and my mates were judged by our boots you’d have had people thinking we were a mix of British Army, Brtish Army SF, Bootnecks and US military, as well as a couple of Italian caribineri, such was our diverse footwear. The search for the perfect boot is a constant, along with that elusive of tools, the racing spoon. Personally, I’m an HH Brown “Matterhorns” made-in-Pennsylvania and much admired by British elite forces type of guy. I still use them as biker boots (and after a 200 mile ride in the rain the only thing dry are my feet). I had no idea I could have started a paranoia rumour in the Guardian? Whatever next.

  10. 16 December, 2010 at 6:03 pm

    The spoilt little shits are lucky (and they know it) to live in such a tolerant society even if they pretend we live in some sort of dictatorship, I’m not so tlerant and my response to the riots would be rather vigourous.

    • 16 December, 2010 at 10:51 pm

      No, they don’t know how lucky they are. I think today’s young people are the luckiest in human history. But if you watch how they behave in public you will see how little self-knowledge they have.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <pre> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>